Co-Executor Refusing to Sell Estate Property? What Executors Can Do
Need advice on your position? See the £480 fixed-fee assessment →
Can one executor sell estate property without the other?
Check whether a Grant has issued and who is named on it. If the sale is urgent and the Grant is outstanding, see the pre-grant section below.
Usually, where two or more personal representatives have proved, a contract or conveyance of estate land requires their concurrence (the required agreement), or a court order, subject to statutory exceptions. This is the general rule under section 2(2) of the Administration of Estates Act 1925.
Check the Grant first. A named executor who has not proved generally does not need to join in, whether or not power was reserved. Read the fuller guide to one executor acting without the other.
Identify the exact refusal. Each calls for a different response:
- Selecting an agent.
- Setting the price.
- Accepting an offer.
- Exchanging contracts.
- Signing the transfer.
- Dealing with proceeds.
What can you do before considering court action?
The appropriate steps depend on what is blocking the sale.
Resolve the valuation disagreement
Consider a joint valuer, independent appraisals or a defined marketing period with review dates.
Agree a sale protocol
Record the agent, asking price, review dates, how offers are assessed and who communicates with the conveyancer.
Request a specific decision
Identify the transaction step, supporting evidence, costs and consequences of delay. Ask for an alternative proposal within a reasonable period.
Separate wider disputes: accounts, occupation or misconduct allegations may be driving the refusal and need their own response.
Negotiate a workable proposal
Distinguish value concerns from disputes about timing, occupation or proceeds. Use the correspondence and the concerns raised to prepare a proposal that addresses the objection.
A refusal to sell may form part of a wider administration deadlock. If a co-executor is also failing to communicate, provide records or deal with estate funds, read our guide to co-executors refusing to act after probate.
What is the effect of delay?
Record recurring insurance, council tax after applicable exemptions, utilities, finance, maintenance and security costs, plus any buyer deadline. Keep one-off costs separate. Use the carrying-cost calculator to compare verified ongoing costs with the likely timetable and proposed sale options. This is a neutral aid to discussion, not a measure of recoverable loss or automatic personal liability; identify which expenses would continue regardless of the disagreement.
The duty to administer under section 25 does not require accepting the first offer or selling at any price. Genuine concerns about value or terms deserve investigation, while prolonged inactivity should have an objective explanation.
Your document review and consultation are directly with Justin Patten, Solicitor.
Dispute Assessment & Action Plan
£480 including VAT
Justin assesses the blocked sale, valuation evidence, reasons given and effect of delay using the assessment framework. The assessment includes:
- Review of up to 40 selected pages of core correspondence and documents.
- A 30-minute consultation directly with Justin Patten.
- A two-page written Action Plan identifying the position, risks and proportionate next steps.
The Action Plan is normally delivered within three working days after the consultation and receipt of all required documents, whichever is later. See the pricing and scope terms.
Where the work is clear, we may quote directly for a sale proposal, negotiation, sale protocol or mediation preparation without a separate assessment. The quotation explains the work, correspondence and review of replies included, the fixed fee and when the instruction ends. You approve any further work before it begins. Agreement cannot be guaranteed.
Not sure this guide matches your circumstances? Use the free Problem Finder.
Documents and facts to locate if you have them
You do not need all of these before enquiring. If documents are unavailable or being withheld, mention that in your enquiry.
- The will and issued Grant, including who proved and any subsequent changes in representation.
- The written objection and correspondence about the agent, offer or sale documents.
- Probate and current valuations, marketing history, offers and any buyer’s deadline.
- A rough schedule of recurring property costs and key dates.
Estimate recurring costs with the carrying-cost calculator →
Turn the Disagreement Into a Clear Discussion Summary
Put the decision needed, both parties’ stated positions and the available figures in one place. The free builder shows a live preview and lets you download or print your own summary. No email is required and nothing is submitted automatically.
Build my Property Discussion Summary →
If you want a preliminary response on whether Human Law can help, use the Suitability Enquiry.
What if an urgent sale is at risk before probate?
If a full grant has not yet issued and delay threatens an imminent sale, seek prompt advice on whether a limited grant ad colligenda bona is appropriate. It may authorise specified steps to preserve the estate, including a property sale, while the full grant remains outstanding. It is not a general shortcut around an executor dispute.
The application must explain the urgency and the authority required. The order and grant determine who can act, what they may do and how the proceeds must be held; a limited grant does not authorise general distribution to beneficiaries. HMRC’s guidance identifies threatened property sales as a use case.
This is different from resolving a sale deadlock after a full grant. If an appointment passing over the person otherwise entitled to the grant is needed, section 116 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 is a separate power requiring special circumstances.
Agreeing a sale is different from distributing its proceeds
Read the will, any trust provisions, the Grant and title documents before assuming that sale proceeds can be divided immediately.
- Does anyone have a right to occupy, a life interest or another interest affecting possession or sale?
- Is the property an estate asset awaiting administration, a specific gift or property held under an ongoing trust?
- Who must consent to or participate in the sale, and who will hold the net proceeds afterwards?
- Does the will require capital to remain invested, with income paid to one person and capital ultimately passing to others?
Illustration: a will may provide a life interest for a spouse with capital passing later to children. Depending on its terms, selling the house may leave the net proceeds subject to that trust; it does not necessarily give the children an immediate right to the capital.
Agree the sale mechanics and the destination of the proceeds separately. Do not use a disputed distribution arrangement as an assumption about the power to sell. Unclear provisions may need interpretation advice, while occupation and trust questions may require separate specialist advice.
If a beneficiary wants the property instead of a sale
Distinguish an occupation dispute or asserted beneficial interest from a proposal to receive the property as part of an inheritance. Appropriation under section 41 is fact-sensitive: valuation, liabilities, beneficiaries’ entitlements and statutory consent and protection safeguards require consideration. It is not an automatic alternative to a sale.
Can the court enable the sale or remove an executor?
After a grant has issued, distinguish a decision needed for the particular sale from a wider problem with who administers the estate. Removal is not the only route to consider.
Directions or an order enabling the sale
Where disagreement concerns the asking price, an offer or the steps needed to complete a sale, seek specialist advice on a focused application to determine the administration question and obtain appropriate directions or an order enabling the transaction. CPR Part 64 provides a procedure for estate-administration questions; the legal basis and precise relief sought depend on the circumstances. This may allow the sale issue to be addressed while the executors remain in office.
Removal or substitution of an executor
Where the difficulty extends beyond one sale and an executor’s continuing appointment impedes proper administration, advice on removal or substitution under section 50 of the Administration of Justice Act 1985 may be appropriate. An order addressing the sale and an application changing the executor serve different purposes; neither should be treated as the automatic next step after disagreement.
In Haynes v Andre [2018] EWHC 489 (Ch), the court replaced an executor after administration had stalled, including a failure to market the estate's principal property. The case illustrates the importance of proper administration; it does not establish that removal should always be preferred to a sale order.
Removal is not automatic. A genuine valuation or trust concern may justify delaying a sale; the court considers the evidence, proportionality, the beneficiaries' interests and whether replacement would improve administration. Harris v Earwicker [2015] EWHC 1915 (Ch) explains the broader approach to removal.
Wider court proceedings require a separate litigation instruction; Justin can help organise a specialist handover. Seek prompt appropriate advice if a formal deadline or immediate asset risk arises.