⚖️ PRACTICE GUIDE | SECTION 25 AEA 1925 & CPR PART 64

A Beneficiary Has Requested Estate Accounts: How Should an Executor Respond?

A beneficiary’s request for estate accounts should be taken seriously, but it does not necessarily require an executor to provide every bank statement, invoice or item of correspondence immediately.

The appropriate response depends on the beneficiary’s interest, the stage reached in the administration, the records available and the purpose of the request. The executor should provide sufficient, accurate information to explain the administration while protecting irrelevant confidential material and avoiding disproportionate work.

The objective is neither to resist legitimate scrutiny nor to surrender the entire administration file. It is to identify what information is reasonably required, organise the records and respond in a measured way.

Facing accounting deadlocks or threatened court claims? Read our pathway for Estate Information and Inventory & Accounts Resolution →

What Is the Executor’s Accounting Duty?

Personal representatives are responsible for collecting and administering the deceased’s estate. Section 25 of the Administration of Estates Act 1925 requires them, when lawfully required to do so, to exhibit an inventory and account of the administration.

Executors should maintain records showing:

  • The assets and liabilities identified;
  • Money received and payments made;
  • Estate income and relevant tax payments;
  • Sales, transfers and distributions;
  • Administration expenses; and
  • The balance remaining for distribution.

Good records protect both the beneficiaries and the executor. They explain how the estate has been administered and provide evidence if a decision or transaction is later questioned.

Pre-Grant Realities

What If Probate Has Not Yet Been Granted?

Before the Grant, the executor may still be identifying assets, liabilities, tax information and the people interested in the estate. Final estate accounts will not ordinarily be possible because the assets have not yet been fully collected and many administration transactions have not occurred.

That does not mean every request should be deferred until probate is obtained. Where appropriate, the executor can provide a proportionate update explaining the known estate position, the work underway, any material uncertainty and why fuller accounts are not yet available.

If a caveat is preventing the Grant, the executor should distinguish that procedural blockage from the continuing need to preserve assets and maintain proper records.

Statutory Protection

Does the Executor Have to Distribute Within the First Year?

Section 44 of the Administration of Estates Act 1925 provides that a personal representative is not bound to distribute the estate before the end of one year from the death. This is commonly called the “executor’s year”.

It allows time to collect assets, establish liabilities, deal with tax and consider claims before completing distribution. It is not a guaranteed completion period: a complex or disputed administration may reasonably take longer.

The executor’s year concerns distribution. It does not create a general right to refuse reasonable information, neglect record-keeping or disregard an application for an inventory and account. Proportionate updates may still be appropriate, particularly where delay or a material transaction affects the beneficiaries.

Does Every Beneficiary Have the Same Interest?

Residuary Beneficiaries: A residuary beneficiary has a direct interest in the balance remaining after liabilities, expenses and earlier gifts have been dealt with. They will ordinarily have a legitimate interest in understanding the estate accounts and calculation of residue.

Specific or Pecuniary Beneficiaries: A beneficiary receiving a fixed cash legacy or particular asset may have a narrower interest. That does not necessarily extend to unrestricted inspection of every aspect of the administration, although information may be appropriate where it affects their entitlement or raises a material concern.

The will or intestacy position, administration stage and purpose of the request should all be considered.

Material Distinction

Estate Accounts and Source Documents Are Different

Estate Accounts are a structured record of the administration. Depending on the estate, they may show:

  • The opening assets and liabilities;
  • Capital and income receipts;
  • Expenses, debts and tax paid;
  • Property or investment transactions;
  • Distributions made; and
  • The calculation and division of residue.

Source Documents include bank statements, invoices, valuations, tax returns, conveyancing papers and correspondence. A request for accounts does not automatically create unrestricted access to every underlying document without regard to relevance, confidentiality and proportionality.

Equally, the distinction should not be used to conceal information required to explain a genuine discrepancy. If a beneficiary identifies a particular figure or transaction, providing the relevant supporting material may resolve the concern efficiently.

Can a Beneficiary Apply for an Inventory and Account?

If satisfactory information is not provided voluntarily, a beneficiary or another person with a sufficient interest may seek a court order requiring the personal representatives to provide an inventory and account.

Under section 25(b) of the Administration of Estates Act 1925, the High Court may require a personal representative to exhibit on oath a full inventory of the estate and render an account of the administration. The beneficiary’s request does not itself constitute an order: an application must be made and the court controls whether, and on what terms, relief is granted.

Depending on the information already supplied and the question requiring determination, a beneficiary may instead bring a claim under CPR Part 64. Practice Direction 64A identifies an order requiring an executor or administrator to provide—and, where necessary, verify—accounts as an available remedy.

Pre-Action Assessment

Considerations Before Formal Proceedings

A court application should not ordinarily be the first response to a routine information request. Before proceedings are considered, the parties should identify:

  • The beneficiary’s interest;
  • The information already supplied;
  • The omissions or discrepancies alleged;
  • Whether targeted documents would answer the concern; and
  • The likely cost and proportionality of an application.

An inventory-and-account order does not necessarily provide unrestricted access to every document in the administration file. Its content, verification and supporting evidence will depend on the order and issues before the court.

A Proportionate Response Process

Step 1
Clarify the Request

Establish whether the beneficiary wants final accounts, an interim update or evidence concerning a particular transaction. A broad request for “all documents” may conceal a narrower concern.

Step 2
Confirm the Beneficiary’s Interest and the Administration Stage

Check the will or intestacy position, confirm the requester’s identity and establish what work remains outstanding. Distinguish unavoidable delay from missing or inadequate records.

Step 3
Provide an Organised Response

Provide the available interim or final accounts, explaining material estimates, reserves, missing information or disputed entries. Address requests for supporting documents by reference to what is reasonably required to explain the administration. Where final accounts cannot yet be prepared, a useful interim response may summarise assets collected, liabilities and tax dealt with, significant transactions, distributions made and the remaining work.

Step 4
Review Personal Information Before Disclosure

Source documents may contain irrelevant information about living beneficiaries or third parties. Bank details, National Insurance numbers, home addresses, signatures and unrelated transactions may require redaction or other protection. Redaction should be proportionate: it should protect unnecessary information without concealing entries needed to explain the administration. Where disclosure is required by law or court order, the executor should follow that requirement and obtain advice if necessary.

Step 5
Preserve the Audit Trail

Keep the request, response, documents supplied and reasons for any limitation. This provides a record if the adequacy of the information is later challenged.

Proportionality Boundaries

When May a Request Be Disproportionate?

A request may require clarification where it seeks every document without identifying a concern, duplicates material already supplied, requests irrelevant personal information, requires extensive reconstruction or forensic analysis, or imposes an unrealistic deadline.

Volume alone does not make a request improper. Extensive material may be justified in a complex estate or where the accounts reveal unexplained transactions. The executor should assess the substance of the request rather than characterise scrutiny itself as unreasonable.

Cost Allocation

Who Bears the Cost?

Preparing ordinary estate accounts is generally part of the administration, and reasonable professional costs may ordinarily be paid from the estate where properly incurred.

Duplicate bundles, bespoke schedules, historical reconstruction or forensic investigation may generate additional expense. Before incurring it, the executor should explain the proposed work, estimated cost and why it may be disproportionate.

The executor should not assume that unusual costs can simply be deducted from the requesting beneficiary’s entitlement. The parties may agree how additional costs will be funded, or the issue may require legal advice or court determination. The court retains discretion over costs in proceedings.

If the Beneficiary Remains Dissatisfied

The parties may agree a schedule of questions, provide targeted documents, obtain an accountant’s input or use negotiation or mediation.

If information remains inadequate, an interested beneficiary may consider an application under section 25(b), or a Part 64 claim seeking accounts, verification or determination of a particular administration question. Part 64 also permits an application for the estate to be administered under the court’s direction. These are formal procedures with potential costs consequences.

Specialist Investigation & Boundaries

Allegations of Misconduct

Allegations of missing assets, self-dealing, unauthorised payments or deliberate concealment may require specialist investigation. Human Law does not undertake detailed forensic bank reconciliation or conduct contested litigation. Where necessary, the records and issues can be organised for an efficient specialist handover.

Response Options at a Glance

Nature of Request Proportionate Response Possible Next Step
General progress request Concise administration update Agree timing for a further update
Estate accounts requested Provide available interim or final accounts Clarify outstanding entries or evidence
Specific transaction questioned Explain the entry and consider relevant source documents Professional review or focused negotiation
Extensive document demand Identify the concern and define proportionate disclosure Agree a document schedule or seek advice
Missing assets or misconduct alleged Preserve records and assess the allegation objectively Specialist investigation or litigation advice

* The correct response depends on the beneficiary’s interest, the estate’s complexity, the stage of administration and the reason for the request.

Universal Diagnostic Step

Stage 01 Factual Audit (£400 + VAT)

If an information request has become a source of delay or dispute, Human Law provides a fixed-fee assessment of the accounting position and proportionate next steps.

  • A 30-minute solicitor consultation;
  • Review of up to 20 core pages;
  • Confirmation of the beneficiary’s apparent interest and administration stage;
  • Identification of the accounts or information presently available;
  • Assessment of material omissions, disputed entries and proportionality;
  • Advice on an appropriate response and non-court options;
  • A two-page written Action Plan; and
  • A fixed-fee recommendation for any suitable subsequent milestone.

The Action Plan is normally delivered within three working days after the consultation and receipt of all required documents. The £400 Stage 01 fee is credited once against the first qualifying milestone instructed within 14 days.

View the Estate Information and Accounts pathway →

Procedural Guidance & Statutory Sources

This guide provides general information about estate administration in England and Wales. It is not legal advice on an individual estate. The appropriate response depends on the will or intestacy, the beneficiary’s interest, the administration stage, the records available and the nature of the request.

  • Administration of Estates Act 1925, section 25
  • Administration of Estates Act 1925, section 44
  • Civil Procedure Rules, Part 64
  • Practice Direction 64A: Estates, Trusts and Charities
  • GOV.UK: Dealing with the estate of someone who has died
About the author: Justin Patten is a practising solicitor with more than 20 years’ experience in dispute resolution and private-client practice. He is the principal of Human Law and author of The Out-of-Court Executor.
About Justin Patten →